<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Launch of The Championship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/launch-of-the-championship/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/launch-of-the-championship</link>
	<description>Rugby Union opinion and discussion, for the fans, by the fans.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curnow</title>
		<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/launch-of-the-championship/comment-page-1#comment-10736</link>
		<dc:creator>Curnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 12:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/?p=2063#comment-10736</guid>
		<description>Prestwick, I agree that the play-off system is vital and would bring much needed revenue to clubs via gate receipts and gives the league a more competitive edge. But unless Loaned Players and Dual Registered players aren’t allowed in the play-offs then I disagree when you state these ‘play-offs’ will benefit the survivor and the team who pushes hardest. 

Loaned players and the introduction of Dual registered players makes nonsense of saying the best club will make it to the top.  With certain clubs having padded-out their team by using loaned players and a seemingly endless supply of D/R players, then it will be a case of those who are in-bed with a Premiership Club and access to these players that would have the better chance of success.

One example is that of Nottingham RFC, who have on occasion fielded a team of which nearly half were LP/DR players, and of course bring skill levels that Nottingham wouldn’t necessarily have - or indeed afford. 

Individual clubs can feel rightly aggrieved when building a squad from their own financial resources only to be beaten by an artificially pumped –up team that looks good regarding league position - but meaningless in reality - evidenced when their parent club calls their loaned players back into the fold.

This will a negative effect on the Championship.  The LP/DR situation needs to be looked at or it will be the Championship that ends up being an ‘artificially pumped-up’ league – looking good on paper but meaningless in reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prestwick, I agree that the play-off system is vital and would bring much needed revenue to clubs via gate receipts and gives the league a more competitive edge. But unless Loaned Players and Dual Registered players aren’t allowed in the play-offs then I disagree when you state these ‘play-offs’ will benefit the survivor and the team who pushes hardest. </p>
<p>Loaned players and the introduction of Dual registered players makes nonsense of saying the best club will make it to the top.  With certain clubs having padded-out their team by using loaned players and a seemingly endless supply of D/R players, then it will be a case of those who are in-bed with a Premiership Club and access to these players that would have the better chance of success.</p>
<p>One example is that of Nottingham RFC, who have on occasion fielded a team of which nearly half were LP/DR players, and of course bring skill levels that Nottingham wouldn’t necessarily have &#8211; or indeed afford. </p>
<p>Individual clubs can feel rightly aggrieved when building a squad from their own financial resources only to be beaten by an artificially pumped –up team that looks good regarding league position &#8211; but meaningless in reality &#8211; evidenced when their parent club calls their loaned players back into the fold.</p>
<p>This will a negative effect on the Championship.  The LP/DR situation needs to be looked at or it will be the Championship that ends up being an ‘artificially pumped-up’ league – looking good on paper but meaningless in reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prestwick</title>
		<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/launch-of-the-championship/comment-page-1#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator>Prestwick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/?p=2063#comment-8256</guid>
		<description>The play-off system I believe if vital. It has worked brilliantly in the Guinness Premiership as it has shown the frailties of teams who while are able to dominate for most of the season in the league, make absolutely no headway in competitions of even relative importance (i.e. the EDF Cup and the the HEC).

To be brutally honest, if like Gloucester and dominating the league for the best part of a season, you can&#039;t then make it stick in either a league play off semi-final or a final then there is something seriously wrong in how you run your team. Dean Ryan was found out swiftly after his first Guinness Premiership play off fiasco and afterwards teams as far afield as the South of France and Ireland knew how to expose his teams mental frailties. 

Play-offs benefit the survivor and the team who pushes hardest despite numerous setbacks. Surely the team that has a rough start but ends up challenging for honours in the top 4 at the end is better suited for a Premiership campaign than the team cruising along at the top for most of the season and then flopping at the last hurdle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The play-off system I believe if vital. It has worked brilliantly in the Guinness Premiership as it has shown the frailties of teams who while are able to dominate for most of the season in the league, make absolutely no headway in competitions of even relative importance (i.e. the EDF Cup and the the HEC).</p>
<p>To be brutally honest, if like Gloucester and dominating the league for the best part of a season, you can&#8217;t then make it stick in either a league play off semi-final or a final then there is something seriously wrong in how you run your team. Dean Ryan was found out swiftly after his first Guinness Premiership play off fiasco and afterwards teams as far afield as the South of France and Ireland knew how to expose his teams mental frailties. </p>
<p>Play-offs benefit the survivor and the team who pushes hardest despite numerous setbacks. Surely the team that has a rough start but ends up challenging for honours in the top 4 at the end is better suited for a Premiership campaign than the team cruising along at the top for most of the season and then flopping at the last hurdle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/launch-of-the-championship/comment-page-1#comment-8246</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/?p=2063#comment-8246</guid>
		<description>Whilst I&#039;m glad that the structure has been changed slightly, and extra investment being put into the championship, the play-off system seems slightly unfair. There could be a dominant team for the majority of the season, who then under-perform in the play-offs, or could be unbeaten and streaks ahead in the league, only to lose in the final. There was a large debate when the premiership format was changed, but surely with so much at stake for these clubs trying to secure promotion, it will not necessarily reward the consistent performer, nor the club most equipped to survive a full season in the premiership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I&#8217;m glad that the structure has been changed slightly, and extra investment being put into the championship, the play-off system seems slightly unfair. There could be a dominant team for the majority of the season, who then under-perform in the play-offs, or could be unbeaten and streaks ahead in the league, only to lose in the final. There was a large debate when the premiership format was changed, but surely with so much at stake for these clubs trying to secure promotion, it will not necessarily reward the consistent performer, nor the club most equipped to survive a full season in the premiership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

