<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guinness Premiership predictions &#8211; Round 6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/guinness-premiership-predictions-round-6/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/guinness-premiership-predictions-round-6</link>
	<description>Rugby Union opinion and discussion, for the fans, by the fans.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spike</title>
		<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/guinness-premiership-predictions-round-6/comment-page-1#comment-4591</link>
		<dc:creator>Spike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/?p=838#comment-4591</guid>
		<description>What was i thinking predicting wasps by 12?! I&#039;m so bloody blinkered. It was the worst Wasps performance, actually the worst team performance in any sport, that i&#039;ve seen for many years. Every player in the Wasps 22 (except Joe Simpson) made about 4/5 mistakes, that&#039;s 88 mistakes in the match! Horrible.
Tom Guest should be fast-tracked into the England team. He has something special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was i thinking predicting wasps by 12?! I&#8217;m so bloody blinkered. It was the worst Wasps performance, actually the worst team performance in any sport, that i&#8217;ve seen for many years. Every player in the Wasps 22 (except Joe Simpson) made about 4/5 mistakes, that&#8217;s 88 mistakes in the match! Horrible.<br />
Tom Guest should be fast-tracked into the England team. He has something special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrie</title>
		<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/guinness-premiership-predictions-round-6/comment-page-1#comment-4592</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/?p=838#comment-4592</guid>
		<description>Obviously did not consider previous seasons results!!  Warriors are back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously did not consider previous seasons results!!  Warriors are back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/guinness-premiership-predictions-round-6/comment-page-1#comment-4590</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 09:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/?p=838#comment-4590</guid>
		<description>Haha...can&#039;t get them all right! Sounds like Sale missed Andrew Sheridan? Let&#039;s hope he pulverises Australia&#039;s pack today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha&#8230;can&#8217;t get them all right! Sounds like Sale missed Andrew Sheridan? Let&#8217;s hope he pulverises Australia&#8217;s pack today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Coates</title>
		<link>http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/guinness-premiership-predictions-round-6/comment-page-1#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Coates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therugbyblog.co.uk/?p=838#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>Not very close to the target in selecting Sale by nineteen points, were you? Sale were very lucky not to have lost by more than double those points as Worcester pulverised their pack in a 17-6 win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not very close to the target in selecting Sale by nineteen points, were you? Sale were very lucky not to have lost by more than double those points as Worcester pulverised their pack in a 17-6 win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

